Trump administration’s The fundamental changes in the United States’ financial policy, foreign relations, and global strategies – together with mass firing in the federal government, we have created uncertainty around the US CyberScript priorities, which was the most prominent digital security conference in Las Vegas this week. “We are not backing up, we are moving in a new direction,” said Robert Costlo, chief information officer of the CyberScure and Infrastructure Security Agency on Thursday.
As in other parts of the federal government, the Trump administration is combining intelligence and cybersecurity agencies to remove the unbiased officials on its agenda. Along with these changes, the White House also has enmity with former US CyberScript officials. For example, in April, Trump specifically directed all departments and agencies to revoke the security clearance of former CISA director Chris Curbs. And last week, after criticizing right -wing activist Laura Loomer, the army secretary recovered an educational appointment that former CISA director Jean Estallley had to fill in the West Point. Among them, former US National Security Agency and Cyber Command Chief Paul Nickens spoke with Defkin founder Jeff Moss at a stage discussion on Friday, focusing on the importance of AI, cybercrime, and digital defense partnerships.
“I think we have now entered a place in the world where technology has become political and basically each of us is in conflict,” Mass said at the beginning of the debate. The drainage, which is on the Open board, agreed, citing Trump’s “Star Gate” AI infrastructure initiative, citing the start of January, Oracle’s Larry Elison, Soft Bank’s Masashi son, and Open’s Sam Altman. “And then two days later, by mere coincidence, (Chinese Generative AI platform) deep sack came out,” the drain was dead. “Amazing.”
The drain also considered the settlement between the US federal government and the tech sector.
“When I was the Director of the NSA and the commander of the US Cyber Command, everyone goes to the Gulf in the quarter or I go to Texas or Boston or elsewhere to see technology,” he said. “And everywhere I went, I was twice the age of those who talked to me. And then when I returned to the DC and I sat at the table, I was one of the younger people there. Well, this is a problem. This is a problem for our nation.”
Throughout the conversation, Natoon made extensive comments to efforts to counter traditional US rivals and opponents, including China, Iran, North Korea and Russia, as well as efforts to counter specific digital risks.
He said, “Why are we not thinking about Ranksware, which I think is now among the great curses we have in our country.” “We’re not making progress against the Ranksware.”
However, sometimes, Moss has tried to advance dialogue towards geographical political changes and conflicts around the world, which are giving uncertainty and fear.
“How are you neutral in this environment? Can you be neutral? Or from the past year, the world’s environment, Ukraine, Israel, Russia, Iran, just choose your own, the United States – how does anyone remain neutral?” Moss asked at the beginning of the conversation. Later he added, “I think I am putting a lot of pressure from the chaos of this situation, I am trying to feel how I will get control.”
Referring to these remarks and comments, Moss did about turning open source software platforms as an alternative to multinational tech companies, Nakason indicated to Masson’s idea that the world was entering an uncertainty of flow.
“It’s going to be an exciting story line that we play through ’25 and ’26. When we return to the Back for this debate next year, will we still get that feeling, oh, we are really neutral? I don’t realize it. I think it will be very difficult.”
