Close Menu
Mobile SpecsMobile Specs

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Honor Magic 8 Lite Review – gsmarena.com Test

    December 8, 2025

    Google Project Aura hands-on: Android XR’s biggest strength is in apps

    December 8, 2025

    Bussel PowerClean Fur Finder Review: This budget-friendly cordless vacuum is simple yet effective

    December 8, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Mobile SpecsMobile Specs
    • Home
    • 5G Phones
    • Android vs iOS
    • Brands
    • Budget Phones
    • Compare
    • Flagships
    • Gaming Phones
    • New Launches
    Mobile SpecsMobile Specs
    Home»Budget Phones»Poko F -7 vs Poko F7 Pro
    Budget Phones

    Poko F -7 vs Poko F7 Pro

    mobile specsBy mobile specsJune 28, 2025No Comments10 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Poko F -7 vs Poko F7 Pro
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Poko F7 series is here, and as usual, Xumi has released not one but two nearly flugus killers – Poko F7 and Poko F7 Pro. Both phones promise advanced performance, premium features and competitive prices, which prove to be true on Poko’s extraordinary price. But when the regular F7 brings a large battery and a slightly large display, the pro model brings a sharp screen, high camera, and a more powerful chip set on the table. With just € 100, this is a tough choice – so what is better deal?

    Poko F7 arrives with the same flagship grade memory option – 12GB of RAM couple, which is made with 256GB or 512GBUFS 4.1 storage, which offers smooth experience and enough space for apps, media and sports. In the European Union, the setting of 12+256GB is 9 449.99, while 12+512GB with similar launch price brackets in India with a similar launch price bracket under 35,000 (~ 399/449).

    Poko F7 Pro has once again offered a 12GB of RAM, which has been introduced in conjunction with 256GB or 512GBUFS 4.1 internal storage. Pricing is high, which will start close to US $ 499 (499) for the global launch 12+256GB version and close to US $ 549 for 12+512 GB.

    Table of contents:

    Starting ones, you can compare the full specs of sheets or continue directly with the diagnosis of our editor in the following text.

    The size comparison

    There is a slight size difference between Poco F7 and POCO F7 Pro. Regular F7 is slightly taller, wide and heavier than pro, it is likely to be due to a large battery and screen. Nevertheless, the two phones are comfortable in a slim and lightweight category for large screen devices. Differences in the hand are notable but not tight – if you value more compact feeling, the Pro here benefits.

    Both phones have the same design language, and both have IP68 English protection.

    The content of the content is preserved by Gorlala Glass Victites in front of both phones. The F7 Pro’s back is made of glass, while the regular F7 uses high quality plastic, which makes the pro feel slightly more premium. The middle frame is plastic on both models, though it has been well eliminated with aluminum.

    Contacts are the same for most parts. Both phones support dual SIM functionality, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and USB-C ports. However, POCO F7 supports the display port video output more than USB-C, which for some reason is missing at the F7 Pro.

    The speaker setup is also the same, both phones offer stereo speakers for dolby Atmos. They are using hybrid stereo arrangements with a joint airpace and a secondary speaker. Setup provides a sharp and balanced sound.

    And both phones also include a standard hepatic motor.

    The placement of the button is standard and permanent between the two phones – the volume rocker and the power key is located on the right, while the left remains clean. Both phones use an under -display optical fingerprint reader, so there is no difference.

    It is worth noting that both models have an IR blaster, which is located near the camera island on the back rather than on the above frame on the above frame.

    Display the comparison

    Both phones include high quality AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rate and dolby vision video support. The Poko F7 has a large display of 6.83 inches with a 2772 x 1280px resolution, while the F7 Pro chooses a slight 6.67 -inch display but with 3200 x 1440px resolution. Therefore, in the case of sophistication, Pro clearly wins with its 526ppi density.

    The maximum screen sparkle is comparison – 1525 nets on F7 and 1478 nets on Pro – so both are excellent in sunlight. It really comes down whether you value the sophistication of more screen estate or extra pixel.

    The bells around the screens are symmetrical and minimal on both phones.

    Battery life

    The F7 Pro has a large battery, both in Poko F7, compared to 6000 mAh of the Pro. However, this extra capacity is not paid because F7 provides longer or equal battery life performance in all our tests except Gaming, which is the only test in which the F7 wins.

    Charging speed

    The charging is equally impressive on both devices, which is out of the 90W wired charging box.

    POCO F7 Pro benefited a bit in our charging speed test, with the F7 39 minutes of full charge in just 34 minutes. Pro F7 also kills 53 % in 15 minutes, compared to 50 %. The differences are small and possibly on the battery size, but if we are distributing the hair, the supporters suffer from the edges.

    Speaker test

    Both phones offer stereo speakers setup and support for dolby atmos. In our loud tests, they scored almost evenly, providing powerful and well -balanced sound. The presence of the boss in Poko F7 is slightly deep, while the F7 Pro cleaner provides midwife. There is no big difference, but audio enthusiasts can prefer pro better tuning pro, while comfortable users will be happy with anyone.

    Efficiency

    The purpose of both Poko F7 and Poko F7 Pro is aimed at the speed of the flagship class, but they are significantly removed from the processing power. The Poko F7 is equipped with the new Snapdragon 8S General 4, which is made on the 4NM process with the All Big Core CPU architecture and peak clock speed around 3.2 GHz. Despite the full snapdragon 8 general 3 within the pro, it also hites well with its middle distance cost, which offers strong performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. The F7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 General 3, however, moves forward with a strong GPU, and performs high permanent performance under high workload.

    In terms of memory, both phones ship with 12GB of LPDR 5X RAM, ensuring smooth multi -tasking and future -proof headroom. Storage compositions are fermented, which offer 256GB or 512 GBUFS 4.1 memory.

    Benchmark performance

    In the artificial benchmark, both phone compounds are almost neck and neck in the compound Antoto Test and the Gack Bench CPU test. But the GPU Heavy 3D Mark Mark reveals a significant difference in the Wildlife Test performance – 4,795 vs. 3,953.

    Recently. , Both phones perform around the same and provide more speeds for most consumers. However, the F7 Pro is a better actor in the graphics heavy scenes such as sports. However, it clearly comes at the cost of battery performance, as the F7 did not last long in our game battery test.

    Camera compares

    Although both POCO F7 Models deploy 50 MP main camera with optical image stability and phase deduce autofox, they actually use different sensors.

    Ultrawide cameras are the same on both phones: an 8 MP camera with a 15 mm lens focal length (read: not too wide). No camera supports autofox, which is common for such a budget ultra -wide sensor.

    Selfies are caught by 20 MP Front Camera (OV20B, F/2.2) on both phones. There is no auto -focus here too. The front video video is limited to 1080p.

    Talking about the video, both phone cameras are able to record up to 60FPS from 4K. Ultra -wide video is closed at 1080p and lacks stability.

    Image standard

    In the daylight, Poko F7 Pro’s main camera produces such a cripple photo. The F7 Pro also has a better dynamic limit in which highlights are better protected.

    Despite the use of the same camera hardware, ultra -wide cameras have a very different output. Poko F7 takes low processed ultra -wide photos, but we prefer the F7 Pro’s faster look.

    As far as 2x shots are concerned, via Vanilla F7, the Poko F7 Pro looks faster than the Pro and vice versa.



















    Poko F -7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x



















    Poko F -7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x

    In low light photography, the two trade is running again. The F7 Pro’s ultra -wide camera really pushes the F7 with very fast images. But when it comes to the main camera, this time we will shake its POCO F7 for its rapid production – a difference, which is visible after a close exam. The benefit of the F7 is also going on at 2X zoom.



















    Poko F -7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x



















    Poko F -7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x

    POCO F7 and F7 Pro are both equipped with the camera in front of the same 20MP, and as expected, the selfie image standard is exactly the same, but we have identified the slightly better light through the F7 Pro.







    Poko F7 selfie







    Poko F7 Pro Selfie

    The quality of the video

    Both phone can record up to 4K from the main camera to 60fps, but the F7 Pro is better and the image description is better. Pro’s footage shows better detail, more natural color and better dynamic range. The same is true in low light. The F7 is not behind, but the Pro Model Board offers a bit better to video quality.

    Below we have some frames from videos taken by two phones at each focal length, so it is easy to compare each other.







    Poko F -7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x Lower Light







    POCO F

    Word

    Poko F7 and Poko F7 Pro are both compulsory offers, providing flagship grade hardware at midwife prices. Each phone is focused on various preferences, which makes the choice a matter of clear and use.

    Poko F7 stands between the two with its large 6.83 inch display and a low -cost tag. This Snapdragon 8s manages excellent performance thanks to the General 4 chip set and offers very excellent main camera performance with some excellent 2X digital zoom shots.

    On the other hand, Poko F7 Pro, offers a better experience. It is also a little lighter and more compact, and it has a glassback instead of plastic. Its high resolution is QHD+ A Emold Display Cruster, its Snapdragon 8 General offers a slightly better performance, and its cameras are slightly more reliable with better HDR processing and better ultra -wide performance at night. The quality of the video in all cameras is even better.

    Finally, both phones are a great choice and rely on the same formula to provide the user’s excellent experience. Poco F7 Pro is a bit better, and if you value this item, it costs extra cash. Everyone’s, the F7 provides some of the greatest price, which is difficult to defeat.


      Get the Xiomi Poko F7 5G:

    • Big display.
    • Long gaming battery life.
    • Better 2x zoom shots.
    • The same user experience.
    • Low -value

      Get the Xiomi Poko F7 Pro:

    • A slightly light and more compact body.
    • High -resin display.
    • A slightly better chip set performance.
    • A slightly better camera HDR (prominent retention).
    • Low light, especially better ultra -wide.
    • High video quality.
    Poko Pro
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleToday’s NYT Connection Indicator, June 28, #748 Answers
    Next Article Pixel phones can find Xifanity WiFi Speed ​​Boost
    mobile specs
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Compare

    Honor Magic 8 Pro battery life and charging speed

    December 7, 2025
    Compare

    Weekly deals: Pixel 10 series, nothing phone (3), (3a) Pro, Xiaomi 15T in Germany

    December 7, 2025
    Compare

    Weekly poll results: Poco F8 Ultra is a hot commodity, Poco F8 Pro lives in its shadow

    December 7, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Redmi K90 Pro Max debuts with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC and a Bose 2.1-channel speaker setup

    October 23, 20255 Views

    GPT5 can be here in this month-there are five features we hope

    July 5, 20254 Views

    Gut Hub spreads about the GPT5 model before the official announcement

    August 7, 20252 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Compare

    Honor Magic 8 Lite Review – gsmarena.com Test

    mobile specsDecember 8, 2025
    Compare

    Google Project Aura hands-on: Android XR’s biggest strength is in apps

    mobile specsDecember 8, 2025
    Compare

    Bussel PowerClean Fur Finder Review: This budget-friendly cordless vacuum is simple yet effective

    mobile specsDecember 8, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Redmi K90 Pro Max debuts with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC and a Bose 2.1-channel speaker setup

    October 23, 20255 Views

    GPT5 can be here in this month-there are five features we hope

    July 5, 20254 Views

    Gut Hub spreads about the GPT5 model before the official announcement

    August 7, 20252 Views
    Our Picks

    Honor Magic 8 Lite Review – gsmarena.com Test

    December 8, 2025

    Google Project Aura hands-on: Android XR’s biggest strength is in apps

    December 8, 2025

    Bussel PowerClean Fur Finder Review: This budget-friendly cordless vacuum is simple yet effective

    December 8, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 MobileSpecs. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.