LG Qned92 LG has a premium mini -led TV in the upper part of the 2025 lineup. It plays incredible volume, tremendous glare, and solid motion processing, but it comes at a much higher price than others in its weight class.
Hyns U8Qg is proud of some high brightness we have seen in our lab tests and stones an incredible sound system. In the upper part, its Google TV smart platform has found excellent gaming features and good smart home integration.
Mani -led TV has traveled a long journey in the last five years. Since their launch and TV preparation, prices have dropped much that is fully focused on mini -led TV in the United States, such as TCL and Hassans, who have taken advantage of this great success by offering low -cost replacement to LG, Samsung and Sony TV.
In the same place, the TV, led by Hens U -8QG Money. This year plays the highest brightness level in our testing. It is also built on a strong Google TV smart platform and offers an incredible sound system.
Similarly, LG Qned92 Mini-LED TV is a premium, top-off line model that has serious color accuracy, a wide selection of HDMI 2.1 ports, and some excellent motion processing games. But at the current price of $ 1,699, is it able to invest in the Flagship Money on LG 2025 when Hassans can get $ 500 low price?
You can like
I crushed the numbers, hiding LG Qnend92 vs. Hussein U8QG to see which mini -led TV is buying better.
Lg qnend92 vs. Hens
Swipe to scroll horizontallyHeader cell – column 0
Lg qnend92
Hisense U8Qg
Size
65 “, 75”, 85 “
55, 65 “, 75”, 85 “, 100”
Ports
4x HDMI 2.1
3x HDMI 2.1, 1xx USB-C
Resolution
3,840 x 2,160p
3,840 x 2,160p
Refresh rate
120hz (up to 144hz)
165hz
hdr
Dolby Vision, HDR 10, HLG
Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10, and HLG
Smart TV Software
Webos
Google TV
ATSC 3.0 Support?
Not
Yes
Processor
Alpha 8 AI processor Gen2
High View Engine Pro Processor
LG QNend92 vs. Henses U8Qg: Design
(Image Credit: LG)
Hassans U8QG and LG Qned92 are both QLD TVs that have backed back lighting, each of the VA (vertical alignment) panel. This means that you will find concrete contradictions on both seats, though neither the LG C5 will be contrary to OLED.
Given that they are LCD TV with a large back lighting system, both models are quite heavy. The weight of 65 -inch lamps U8QG is more than 10 pounds compared to LG Qnend92 in 41.9lbs, respectively, 53.4lbs.
This weight disparity can have to be done with a large speaker system on U8QG: it is made with a 4.1.2 channel setup with a total output, which includes 20W sub -woofer, as well as side firing and up -firing speakers.
Meanwhile, LG Qnend92 with only 2.2 channel speaker with 40W output. Despite the support of the dolbi atoms, it cannot keep a candle against the hike system.
Another negative aspect on LGTV is that it comes with trilateral legs contrary to the pedestal stand, which is with the U8QG. This makes it difficult to keep small entertainment stands.
Winner: Hisense U8Qg
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
Lg qnend92 vs. Hens U8qg: ports
When it comes to ports, LG knocked it out of the park. Like its OLED lineup, LG built Qnend92 with a complete set of four HDMI 2.1 ports. Hassans U8QG have three HDMI 2.1 ports, but the USB-C video is offered to the fourth in favor of input.
Why USB-C? Although practically for gamers, this concept is still a bit strange to me. If you are adding a PC to the display, you will really have big benefits from the USB-C port, which will probably be less in most cases.
It would be much more beneficial if Hussein would have added the HDMI 2.2 port instead, and had given it a leg against other major TV brands – but we would have to wait for most of the display until next year.
Winner: Lg qnend92
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
LG QNend92 vs Hens U8qg: Remote
As I mentioned in our LG C5 OLED vs TCL QM8K Faceoff, the LG re -designed remote is a welcome change, but it is still at its rates. No dedicated input button makes switching a painful process between TV sources, and its dual scrolling wheel and select button is real pain.
On the other hand, the remote remote of the hassle is pure happiness. It comes with a full array of backlet buttons and many excellent streaming services. It can be made a little smaller, but otherwise it fits comfortably in your palm.
Winner: Hisense U8Qg
LG QNend92 vs. Hens U8qg: Performance
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
Let’s look at the results of the TV test led by both semen to see how they stack their performance before diving.
Swipe to scroll horizontallyHeader cell – column 0
Lg qnend92
Hisense U8Qg
SDR sparkle (10 %, in nets)
692
2,908
Delta-A (Lower is better)
1.5
2.4
HDR sparkle (10 %, in nets)
1,199
3,916
UHDA-P3 Gamt Coverage
95.57 %
97.53 %
Rick 2020 Gamt Coverage
77.42 %
83.98 %
Input latanesei (mill sec)
13.3
9.7
The measurement here deserves a lot of Hassans U8QG. As expected, the hazans have the best class brightness, which contains about 3,000 nets in the standard material and less than 4,000 nuts in HDR.
When it comes to HDR, there is no reduction in QND 92 (1,199 nets in 10 % window we expect to watch from mini -led TV in 2025), but when it comes to brightness, U8Qg is clearly winning here.
When it comes to color volume, Hisense’s UHDA-P3 and Rec2020 Games are slightly higher than LG Qnend92, which is coming to 97.53 % and 83.98 % respectively. It will directly translate into more dynamic, colorful image.
However, this is not a complete sweep. Qnend92 has a lower Delta. It covers the metric color accuracy, which is better than a high number. Unfortunately, while the LG Mini -led TV can be more accurate, technically, under the score of 3, anything under the score of 3 is largely unimaginable to the human eye.
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
In my testing, I noticed that LG Qnend92 has better support for anti -chair, yet it does not have any anti -glare coating like a hassle. Generally, high -lukewarm TV would be better to deal with the integrity light, but in this regard, the Hussein U8QG suffered a lot, mainly in the evening when my kitchen was running background lights.
Unfortunately, the better anti -glear coating and the slightly more color accuracy is not enough to help Qnend92 win here. LG’s top codes cannot compete with U8QG in just two of the most important performance measurements, brightness and color volume.
Winner: Hisense U8Qg
LG Qned92 vs. Hens U8qg: Smart platform and features
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
Let’s not make words here, both TV interfaces are surrounded by interference advertising that can be removed from the whole experience. In the perfect world, we will not need to deal with advertising on any platform.
The negative aspect of LG Qned92 is that it has a lack of ATSC 3.0 toner, which has Hisense U8qg equipped. This makes you access to the Next Gent TV and more than 4K broadcasts via Air Digital Antenna. This technology is not quite common yet, but give it a few years and it will definitely be an important honor for Hans U8QG.
But there is one thing that offers the webs that Google does not do TV: a five -year upgrade path. This means that LG will maintain an upgrade for five years in software, and promote your LG Qnend92 against potential safety violations.
You can discuss it both in both ways, but I think the web OS still has Google TV bat. The LGTV interface has its own free channels, cloud gaming services, and a five -year upgrade path, all of which help stand against Google’s smart TV platform.
Winner: Lg qnend92
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
LG QNend92 vs Hens U8qg: Gaming
(Image Credit: Tom Guide)
U8QG and Qned92 are both extraordinary gaming display. It is clear to me that it is more inclined to the PC gaming circle due to its 165Hz refresh rate and USB-C video output, but that does not mean that it is a realistic choice for gamers. LG Qned also makes a solid case for itself.
Qnend92 U8QG is equipped with four HDMI 2.1 ports compared to all three. In addition, it has a sophisticated game optimizer, which I personally liked to examine in my review.
Although both TV share similar gaming features, such as VRR, Alam, and AMD Frensic Premium, what separates them is delayed in their input. Hyns U8QG kills minimum of 9.7ms while LG Qnend92 comes in 13.3ms. Although this is not a terrible number, because nothing less than 16 MS is perfect, the input Latics offers excellent gaming performance under 10 MS.
If you are looking for a dynamic, glare setting screen to connect with your Xbox Series X or PS5 Pro, LG Qnend92 is a secure bet. If you are planning to get the best possible results by running one of the best gaming PCs, go with the Hyns U8QG.
Winner: Tie
LG QNend92 vs Hens U8qg: Outlook
Swipe to scroll horizontallyHeader cell – column 0
Lg qnend92
Hisense U8Qg
Sixty (25)
21
23
Design (25)
22
24
Performance (25)
21
24
Features (25)
23
25
Total scores (100)
87
96
Hesse is still the king of Mani -led TV and U8QG this year in our testing lab we have offered some of the best performance measurements.
The Qned92 Performance Department has no shortage, but in the coffin of Qnend92, the nail nail is worth it. Unlike U8QG, which now has the best proportion of price performance in the mini -led market, QND 92 is very expensive to make valuable investments.
Keeping both of their prices, if you want to get the best possible view, Hens U8QG is definitely the right call … but you may be better than waiting for Black Friday later this year.
Today’s Best LG Qnend92, Hens U8Qg Money 4K TV 65 Inch and Hens 55U8QG deals
