Intro
Samsung’s next foldable flagship improves polishing and flip ideas and if you want to sink your feet in this particular water, this is the best option, or we should call the form factor.
On the other hand, we have tough and traditional phones to choose, and Galaxy S25 is a great example, especially because it is less or less non -folding alternative Galaxy Z Flip 7.
So, let’s compare the two and see who wins the heart of Samsung fans. A little bit of relief: Galaxy Z Flip 7 The test is still rounding the test inside our lab, so we will soon update comparisons with benchmarks and samples.
Galaxy Z Flip 7 Versus Galaxy S. 25 Differences:
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| This is a flexible flip phone, it turns in half of | Hard like a rock, not twist (more than once) |
| A little larger, but paired it gets more compact | This disclosed z Flip is compact more than 7 |
| Overall design is very similar, but it has a cover screen | Flatback, front and sides, no extra display |
| Upgraded 50MP Main Camera | Main Camera is too much the same |
| 1-120hz AMOLED Main Display, 2600 nets sparkle | 120hz AMOLED Display, Glow of the same peak |
| Large display on 6.9 inch, the same pixel density | 6.2 inch display, 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution |
| 4.1 -inch core screen with 120hz refresh rate | There is no other screen on it |
| Samsung’s latest acneos 2500 silicon | Snap Dragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Here |
| 12 GB RAM | Here too 12GB of ram |
| Large 4,300mAh battery | 4,000 mm h |
| The same charging speed | 25W wired, 15W wireless charging |
| More expensive on 99 1099 | Is cheap on 99 799 for base model |
Table of contents:
Also read:
Design and size
Do not flip or flip?
On the other hand, Galaxy Z Flip 7 When the folded it becomes a small square, but it is slightly thicker, and whenever you need to do something complicated, you also have to open it – the core screen can only work.
Therefore, at the end of the day, it is that you are fine tens of the day with folding and opening your phone or you prefer the “permanent front” device, though a little bigger.
When it comes to size and weight, there are some severe numbers.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Thickness Discovery: 6.5 mm Pair: 13.7 mm | Thickness 7.2 mm |
| Dimension Discovery: 166.7 x 75.2 | Dimension 146.9 x 70.5 |
| Weight 188 grams | Weight 162 grams |
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| – from. | Black of blue |
| – from. | The silver of silver |
| – from. | Naval |
| The blue shade | Icy blue |
| Mint (Samsung.com Special) | Mint |
| Jet Black | Pink gold |
| Coral red | Coral red |
Demonstrate the differences
Two vs. One
We have returned to the folding debate. Actually, Galaxy Z Flip 7 A beautiful 6.9 -inch main screen of sports, which is an advantage on a traditional screen of 6.2 inches Galaxy S. 25.
Of course, there is a secondary core screen, so you don’t need to open the phone whenever you need to do something quickly. This time it has a 4.1 “AMOLED 120hz refresh rate, so Samsung has extended his game with the Lord Galaxy Z Flip 7.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Size Main Screen: 6.9 “ Cover screen: 4.1 “ | Size Main Screen: 6.2 “ |
| Flash 2600 nets (peaks) | Flash 2600 nets (peaks) |
Screens on both Galaxy Z Flip 7 Keep 120 Hz Refresh Rate Treatment, but is the main LTPO with a 1-120 Hz cover, while the core has 60/120 HHz refresh rate fixed. Galaxy S. 25Of course, the same LTPO uses the tech and is able to go between 1 and 120 hits with everything between it.
Performance and Software
Acneos vs Snapdragon
Galaxy S. 25 Gack bench singles and multi -core tests arranged close to 3000 and 9000 points, which is a routine of Snapdragon 8 elite phones.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Chip Samsung Acinos 2500 | Chip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Process 3nm | Process 3nm |
| Rab 12 GB | Rab 12 GB |
Galaxy Z Flip 7 Launches with Vanie 8 out of the box Android 16. Both Galaxy Z Flip 7 And Galaxy S. 25 It will be cooperated for seven long years and will achieve all the good of the AI ​​which is inevitable in the future. Therefore, this section has a tie.
Camera
How bad do you need this telephoto?
Another area where these two phones are very similar. The two have 50MP important cameras with similar aperture and sensor size. Ultra -wide cameras on both of them are almost the same, with only a small difference in FOV (maybe positioning lenses).
The biggest difference, of course, is, the presence of a dedicated telephoto camera Galaxy S. 25. Compared to the results of a high camera score for S25 when compared to Galaxy Z Flip 7.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Main 50 mp F/1.8 23 mm (wide) 1/1.57 “ | Main 50 mp F/1.8 24 mm (wide) 1/1.56 “ |
| Ultrawide 12 mp F/2.2 13 mm (Ultrawide) 123 FOV | Ultrawide 12 mp F/2.2 13 mm (Ultrawide) 120 FOV |
| n/a | Telephoto 10 mp F/2.4 67 mm 3x Optical Zoom |
Talking about camera scores, Galaxy S. 25 A total of 147 (158) scored, which is a beautiful decent outcome! We don’t expect Galaxy Z Flip 7 To be able to meet it, but, as always, we will take away some comparison samples and see what the real life differences are.
Battery life and charging
A little advantage to flip?
We have to keep in mind the fact that Galaxy Z Flip 7 There are two displays, so it needs more power, but we need to run our battery test to assess how much (if any). Galaxy S. 25 Our battery test scored a total of 7H 6 meters, which holds #60 in all phones tested in the last 2 years. Not very good, not terrible – just a good average score.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7* | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Battery scope 4300 Mae | Battery scope 4000 months |
The speed of charging 15W wireless charging USB-C | The speed of charging 25w wired 15W wireless charging USB-C |
Charging speed has been very slow on most Samsung devices, and Galaxy S. 25 There is no exception. 25W wired charging and 15W wireless sharp but anything, but that’s what it is. Sorry Galaxy Z Flip 7 It seems that these speeds are following, at least when it comes to wired charging, and no record will be set.
Comparison of spears.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7 | Galaxy S. 25 |
|---|---|
| Size, weight 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mm 188 g | Size, weight 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm 162 g |
| Screen The main: 6.9 “ amooled 1-120hz 2600 nets peak Cover: 4.1 “ 120hz | Screen The main: 6.2 “ amooled 1-120hz 2600 nets peak |
| Processor Samsung Acinos 2500 3nm | Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 3nm |
| Version: 12/256 GB 12/512GB lpddr5 | Version: 12/128 GB 12/256 GB 12/512GB lpddr5 |
| Camera: 50mp Main 12MP Ultrawide 10MP Front | Camera: 50mp Main 12MP Ultrawide 10MP telephoto 10MP Front |
| Battery: 4300 Mae | Battery: 4,000 months |
| Charging: USB-C 25w wired 15W wireless charging | Charging: USB-C 25w wired 15W wireless charging |
Abstract
Galaxy S. 25 Is cheap, it has an additional telephone camera, and it’s more compact than disclosure Z Flip 7. But on the other hand, you cannot re -reproduce the experience of having a flip phone that connects half, and the minor benefits we mention may be irrelevant if you have decided to go for it.
Within Exynos 2500 Galaxy Z Flip 7 There is a mystery (when we type it, the tests are going on), but we suspect it will make Snapdragon 8 Elite the best within S25.
Once we finish checking we will update this comparison with all benchmarks Galaxy Z Flip 7So be in touch.
