The way to train your dragon is literally the best movie at all times. There is no question about it. I have seen many times that I have memorized most of the script. I listen to the sound track a few times. I have 4 teeth -equipped plush and one dental.
When a remake came out last week, my friends’ burden asked me to ask if I had seen it. Unfortunately, I have. I was Very passionate To train my Dragon’s direct action remake for how I had already booked my tickets to appear before the release day.
But when I left the film theater, I was disappointed and (the most important thing) was sad.
You can like
However, not all ended. In fact, your way to train Dragon is running on a prime video, which is one of the best streaming services right now. Even you can get prime video for free now.
So, if you ask me, direct action is not worth your time to train your dragon, and you should see OG repeatedly. Why do I think the way to train my dragon is a wrong fire?
‘How to train your dragon’ about who is about?
How to train your dragon | Official trailer – YouTube
Look
If you don’t already know, I will give you a fast run for a dear children’s movie. Therefore, the method of training your dragon is based on the Burke, this island is some uncontrollable place in Scandinavia, and a young Viking follows the story of Hiccup. Hiccup is an outsider – she’s not as strong, bloody, or violent as the rest of the Vikings.
Burke has been harassed by the dragon attacks, and other Vikings are on the verge of eliminating all dragons. So when the hiccup is friendly with the most dangerous dragon, it seems to realize that killing dragons is wrong. See the above direct action trailer.
‘How to train your dragon’ direct action remake is unbearable
(Image Credit: Almi / Capital Pictures / Universal Studios)
I allow myself to argue that the original “method of training your dragon” is made so magical.
In OG, the personality of the hiccup is poor. She is sarcastic, jade and lonely. At the beginning of the film, he is a boy who is a credit wolf, anxious to accept and will lie to his colleagues to get it. She is an outcast because she’s different: she’s weak, scrawling and a little vamp. By the end of the movie, she is rounded, tolerant and liking Because Of this individuality
In the remake, although, he descends from the more petolent. The delivery of its line is different: Jay Baruchil’s temporary, Latif Jobs, is an unpleasant snake. Certainly, this is probably more accurate of real life (if you hate everyone, you will hate everyone), but this does not accurately reflect the character we were actually introduced.
Hiccup is not unique, he is standing and white.
Hiccup interaction with other characters also feels flat. The barbed jokes that went to the heads of others Are There, they are not ridiculous, they are wing.
I want to see more intelligence with hiccups in the future remakes (if they make them, of course). Not only cruelty, but intellect and charm, because it is hiccup that we were introduced to the original film.
(Image Credit: Alami / Maximum movie / Dream Works)
It brings me humor. The OG “how to train your dragon” is filled with jokes, copes and dynamic. However, most of it was either worthy of crane or not in the remake.
In the scene where Astrid says dental and hiccups say, “I’m going through a lie – I’m making Organizations …“(Etc.), there is no life here. Line delivery quickly and baseless, as actors just wanted to eliminate the scene so that they can go home. It has energy missing, and this is not just the scene.
Views during the dragon training are probably the only part of the film that I thought had actually improved. But the secondary character (Fislegus, Snatlot, refant, tufts) were just terrible. As a result of crankable delivery and matching humor, a keen and strange clock resulted.
(Image Credit: Alami / Landmark Media / Universal Studio)
I am not sure whether others may have felt this problem, but when I memorized 90 % OG script, I am sure.
In the original movie, A Lot Dialogue disrupts. It makes the characters real, and the world feels to live in it.
For example, in the scene where hiccups and Tootles are making friends with Kovo, Hiccup says: “Dent -free. I swear by you -” Takes his teeth and kisses the fish. The hiccup quickly ended with a surprised, “tooth”.
But in direct action, it is as if the actor was waiting for the CGI dragon to increase, and the delivery fell flat. It happened several times throughout the film, and it was not just Mason teams – other actors stumbled upon it.
(Image Credit: Alami / Photo 12 / Dream Works)
This strange delivery makes the world feel like a set, not really a deep experience. I felt like I know the actors are acting, and they know they are acting, so I felt away from the characters.
I am not saying that the remake is irreparable (98 % of the tomato audiences disagree with me, clearly), but these are just a few reasons why the OG is “infinite better”.
(Image Credit: Alami / AJ Picture / Dream Works)
Gerard Butler played Hiccup’s chief father, Stoke, the original “How to train his Dragon”. And he also played the role of Hiccup’s chief father, Stoke in the remake of “How to Train his Dragon”. I think it was a big shot in the foot.
Since Butler completely strengthened his role as a stoke, he showed every other actor. I couldn’t help but in this scene I compare Butler to everyone. Not surprisingly, Butler always came out.
Gerard Butler was only one of the 100 % positive parts of his dragon’s remake method. Everything about it was perfect: his delivery, his intellect, his clothing, his web. As a result, he made Deduction The rest of the film is the most obvious of perfection. It may not be bad if he cast a different actor as a stoke, the difference would not have been so bad. (But then, once again, Butler does not own his character even more.)
Because Gerard Butler killed his character completely – he intended to take kind – he just showed to all. Especially good frost as dung. Now, I like good frost. I think he will do a wonderful job as a Horoded in the new HBO Potter. I like hot foods, and men’s splendor. But I can’t lie – I think he was in a dramatic misconception in this movie.
Most of his line delivery was flat, as the actor himself was bored during production. I am not sure if this was due to the direction, maybe if the doubles wants to show dung in a different light. But in my opinion, he just didn’t work. As a dung in OG, Craig Ferguson is hard, sharp and kind of brutality, and for this reason you should see only OG on the Prime Video “How to Train your Dragon”.
What is the benefit of a direct action ‘Training your Dragon’ when Duthergonist is anyway?
(Image Credit: Alami / BFA / Universal Studios)
Now, this is the last point professional threat. There was no way around him. Dream Works and Universal set up “HTTYD” to fail.
Without teeth, the deutergunist (the secondary character of the main character, alias Hiccup), is literally a dragon. Dragon, if you have not paid attention, does not exist. So, regardless of the direct action or dynamic of the film, the Toothales will have to be resurrected through the CGI.
All the time when I was watching the “httyd” remake, I couldn’t help but thought: Who asked for this? Because it was not, the “httd” number a fan. I wanted to love her. I wanted to love her Too bad.
If I was able to capture the magic of the new “httyd” original, I love it. But it just didn’t …
I am not sure whether it is doing secondary letters, screenplay, or direction. Since he is the director and writer in the remake of “HTTYD”, such as the original, I suspect it is the latter.
Nevertheless, I think Mason Tams (direct action hiccups) did a wonderful job of making the character embedded It was given. These problems are not working – I have the best direction. I think most of the problems are combined with the script, direction and two -dimensional auxiliary world.
But it’s not all bad … something improved
I will be the first to recognize that your way to train your dragon is not perfect. Looking back as an adult makes me realize that the role of Esthed has been wrong. However, the direct action completely corrected it.
Esthed is more kick ass than before
(Image Credit: Alami / Landmark Media / Universal Studios)
The only part of the remake that OG is out of OG is Astrid. Now, I have nothing against the United States Ferreira, who actually gave a voice to Esterd – he did a wonderful job with the script. This is a completely written issue.
In OG, Esthed Kick is ass, sure. But he does not have an agency. He does not have personal motivations – he is opposed to hiccups, and then he is interested in love.
However, in the remake, Astrid has a goal. She is dead when she is the best-she wants to be the chief of the village one day-and she has to work hard because she does not come from money.
With hiccups, the chief’s son, never needed to worry about money. But Easter is from a low -privileged background, so it has to work hard to reach this place.
It is an irony that Esthed actress Nico Parker is a napo child, but I dig. Parker did a wonderful job that resurrected new and improved Easter. While, yes, she’s a napo baby, she’s a napo baby who certainly shines in her first major film.
I will fight anyone in the comments that don’t agree with me – let me, I dare you. I and my dental free plots are ready.
