Kafman argued that biological evolution is creating new possibilities not only for new types of biology but also for organisms, which were not only present in the first phase of evolution but could not be possible. 3 billion years ago, from the soup of a single-cell biology that made life on Earth, no elephant could suddenly be exposed-for this, a whole, a whole host of permanent but specific innovations.
However, there is no ideological limit to the number of use of an item. This means that the appearance of new functions in evolution cannot be predicted – and nevertheless, some new functions can order the rules on how the system is developed after that. Kafman said, “Biosfire is creating its own possibilities.” Not only do we know what will happen, we do not know what can happen. “Photo Santhais was such a deep development. Likewise, ukreths, nervous systems and language were also made by micro -biologist, Carl Waz, a mediocare, a mediocare, a mediocare, a microfologist. Set is needed. But this rule of this rules needs to be prepared by itself. That way, we end up with an unlimited rating. “
Paul Davis, a physicist at Arizona State University, agrees that biological evolution “creates a place of its expanded possibility, which cannot be predicted or that it cannot be predicted by any exact action from the previous states. Therefore, life is partial.”
“Increasing complexity provides the ability to find a new strategy in the future that is not available for easy organisms.”
Marcus Hesler, University of Sydney
According to mathematics, a “place of phase” is a way to describe every possible sequence of the physical system, whether it is relatively simple as it is like an ideal pendant or complicated like all earth -containing atoms. Davis and his fellow workers have recently suggested that evolution in the accessible stage can be officially equal to the “incomplete theory” developed by Kurt Godel, a mathematical expert. Geodel shows that any axis system in mathematics allows the formation of statements that cannot be shown true or false. We can just decide such statements by adding new axes.
Davis and his colleagues say, like Jadeel’s theory, the key element that makes biological evolution openly and prevents us from expressing it in a place of self -made and all sorts of phase is that it is a reference to the new actors in space to create new people in the appearance of new actors. This is not a matter of physical system, even if they have millions of stars in the galaxy, there are no references themselves.
“Increasing complexity provides the ability to find a new strategy in the future,” said Marcus Hesler, a co -operation, a biologist and incomplete paper, said. The relationship between biological evolution and instability, Davis, said, “Magic is so magical that it goes into his heart.”
Is the biology special, then, in the evolutionary process of being openly common in self -reference? Hezen believes that once the complex cognition is added to the compound-once the components of the system “in their heads” can cause, choosing and running. This macro -micro -opinion and open growth potential is even higher. “Technical requests take us ahead of Darwinism,” he said. If the watchmaker is not blind then the clock becomes faster.
Back to the bench
If Hezen and partner are right that the evolution involved in any type of selection inevitably active information – in effect, increases complexity, it means life, and perhaps consciousness and high intelligence, is inevitable in the universe? It will run against some biology ideas. The renowned evolutionary biologist Ernest Meyer believed that the search for extraordinary intelligence was ruined because the appearance of intelligence like humans “is impossible.” However, he said, “If the intelligence that leads to cultures and civilizations at some level was so useful in the evolution of Darwin, how was it born only once in the whole tree of life?”
The evolutionary point of Maya is potentially eliminated in the jump towards human complexity and intelligence, after which the entire playground changes. Humans have dominated the planets so fast (for better or worse) that the question of when this question arises is again.
Example: Irene Perez for Quanta Magazine
But what about the possibility of being in the first place of such jumps? If the new “Functional Information Law” is correct, it seems like life is obliged to be more complicated than the jumps and limits. It does not have to rely on an most impossible opportunity event.
In addition, such an increase in complexity seems to mean the appearance of new effective laws in nature, while, the smallest component is not consistent with the basic laws of the physics, but effectively assumes power in determining what happens. We allegedly see it in the biology already: Apocryphal experience of falling two people from a money -bearing tower is no longer a prediction of prediction when the public is not a bird of artillery but a living bird.
