Before this update, activation of the touch lock on the pixel watches will disable the touch screen running OS 4 or early clothing OS 5. This stopped accidental inputs from wandering or droplets of water, which was useful during activities like exercise or in a wet environment.
Significantly, when the touch capacity was closed, the rotating crown remained active. Customers can still scroll down to see quick settings (checking battery, contacts) or scroll down to browse upcoming notifications, without need to touch the display.


On and off the touch lock on a pixel clock. | Image Credit – 9TO5GOGLE
New behavior in the wearing OS 5.1
After the OS 5.1 wear updates, activating the touch lock Now disables both touch screen and rotating crowns. With a touch lock active, the screen ignores taps, and the crown no longer responds to circulation. Only the interaction is a two -second long pressure of the crown, which completely disables the lock. This amendment has criticized some users. One indicated Old system convenience, especially during the shower, to check notifications with the crown, a scene where the use of touch screen is non -practical. This specific change comes like 5.1 with the rollout of the wear -wear OS 5 and the then point of point. Wear OS 5 Self -improvement focus, including battery life correction and new developer tools. Small use opportunities are common in updates like 5.1, but, as seen here, can sometimes have a significant impact on daily user experience, especially compared to competitors like Apple Watch or Samsung Galaxy Watch, whose screen lock is fine.
Currently, it is not certain if Google has to disable the crown functionality with touch lock or if it wear is unintentionally bug in OS 5.1. The company has not updated official support documents for touch lock to reflect this change. This affected users are expecting or fixing the future software update, possibly in the next monthly patch cycle if it is considered a bug.
When the touch lock is over, disabling all physical input methods seems to be somewhat contradictory for the designed device designed by quick looks. Restricting dialogue options, even when you try to stop accidental input, can reduce clock facilities in some situations. We are waiting for Google’s explanation whether this is a new standard or not.

