Nothing a third -generation phone doubles on its visual identity, even more customized LED, a separate UI design, and a better aesthetic that is unlike anything in Android.
It is easy to appreciate this ambition, and as a person who is a bit different from the mold, I respect it. Nothing phone (3) The polished rectangles want to feel special, expression and fun in the sea of rectangles. But once you go through a unique presentation, it becomes clear that being different does not always mean better, even more when you receive $ 800.
We have tested the phone (3) deeply, and compared the best alternatives at its price, and the results are not flatter. Whether it shows performance, camera quality, video capabilities, or even the brightness, the latest effort of anything does not follow the contest, sometimes with a major margin. It makes it difficult to recommend, regardless of how much I want to root for the underdug.
A bold bold design that still turns the head, but is it enough?
Two color options for the phone (3). | Image Credit – Nothing
Let’s start with good. Nothing phone (3) design is amazingly amazing, especially for tech fans like ours. Transparent waist, better glyph lighting, and symmetrical borders still turn the head, and the quality of the quality is advanced. I dig it, because it reminds me of something of the star war. This phone was made to watch and feel, not only used. It is also commendable that nothing is burdened with the phone with blotware or visual clutter-the skin and thinking of justice software helps to feel more premiums than most mid-rangers.
However, this focus on the design does not change the fact that it is entering a class ($ 800 and above) that does not compromise on accessories, such as Pixel 9, Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, and iPhone 16. And in this place. Nothing phone (3) Stumble, hard.
Display and Performance: On the edge between the middle range and the flagship
The phone (3) screen looks good inside the house, but the outdoor brightness is behind the competition. | Image Credit – First
Despite its sleek look, when it comes to real -world performance, the phone (3) display is not affected. It is a 6.7-inch OLED panel that has good resolution and 120Hz refresh rate-all the fountains that look great on the paper. But in our lab tests, his colleagues had a lowest brightness level in 20 % APL (only 1501 nets), which means that outdoors face outdoors than outside exposure. Pixel 9 Or Galaxy S. 25Both of them move more than 2000 nuts. At the other end of the scale, its minimum brightness was the highest (2 nuts), which is less comfortable to use in bed or dim light.
The amazing savings was a color accuracy, which proved to be excellent than the competition. He said, this is something that can be very different among the units, so it is certainly not guaranteed that all other Nothing phone (3) The devices will show such results.
The chip performance offers a similar mixed bag type. Snapdragon 8s General 4 Chip, the phone (3) is finally using a flagship silicon – the first phone to use this chip. It beats easily Pixel 9In some cases tanker G4 and even Apple’s A18, but it’s still not close to Snapdragon 8 Elite Powering phones like Galaxy S. 25 And One Plus 13.
Our performance score confirmed the space. The phone (3) scored 7.6 in light tasks and 7.2 in heavy tasks. For comparisons, One Plus 13 Heavy work loads are hit 9.0 – when using gaming, multi -tasking, or demanding apps is a huge difference in response.
The flagship hardware was due to lack of experience
Despite the decorated sunglasses, the phone (3) struggles with overshipping, noise, and uneven quality of image. | Image Credit – First
On paper, Nothing phone (3) Decorated: It prouds the 50MP main camera with a large 1/1.3 “sensor and OS, 50 MP Permacoop Tele Photo Lens with 3x Optical Zoom, and a 50 MP Ultra Wide Shooter that does not promise with a view of 1144. This is a high razor camera.
In all cameras, we saw aggressive over -sharpening, causing images to be unnaturally crisp, especially in skin heads and textures. Although the central camera is worthy of sharp images thanks to its large sensor, processing often removes them from depth and realism. Ultra -wide shots showed decent consistency in the color but it lacked good details. Percup zoom lens is an amazing surprise in this segment, but the results were hit or miss-3 x with good sophistication, but in low light poor dynamic limit and visible noise.
It is clear that the hardware is there, but nothing is left behind. In comparison, Pixel 9A produced permanently more balanced, natural -looking images with better dynamic range and color handling. The OnePlus 13R, despite the low lenses, offers more reliable results in both the image and the video. And let’s not start comparing it Galaxy S. 25 Or IPhone 16.
Solid charging speed cannot hide battery reduction
Large battery, influence results. | Image Credit – First
Battery life should have been one of these few areas where Nothing phone (3) It has a large number of 5150 MAH battery and tonic software. But in our phone (3) reviews, he only scored 6.7. Our tests showed only 6H 45 minutes of estimated battery life. It’s better than just a ted IPhone 16S 6h 21 minutes and close to Pixel 96 6H 48 minutes. It doesn’t look bad unless you remember that the iPhone and the pixel have very small batteries.
On the other hand, charging, is actually one of the bright spots of the phone (3). It supports 65W wired charging and 15W wireless, and in our test he provided a fastest top -up in his class (about 1 hour), which defeated him. Pixel 9 And IPhone 16And even get out of it Galaxy S. 25. He said, One Plus 13 Still, the supreme rule here with rapid and better thermal control.
Nothing else has happened, but still it doesn’t feel enough
It is clear that nothing is a strong identity and vision of what the phone should be. Nothing phone (3) Has nothing else ever been on the real flagship phone? But for most consumers, especially for people who spend $ 800 and more, the basic experience is what is really important, and in this case it is not polished at the “flagship level”.
Nothing phone (3) Is – as I put it several times now – a mixed bag. If you go and buy it, there will undoubtedly have some things you like, but also a equivalent amount that makes you angry. I will have a very easy time to recommend it if it costs $ 700, as the difference in this price is understood by taking into account polish reduction. As it stands right now, though, I think it’s a product that is not quite round enough to stay in this category.
One last thing is worth considering – while I personally enjoy gadgets with a bold, industrial aesthetic, Nothing phone (3)The design will certainly not appeal to everyone. Such a look is a two -edged sword: specific and freshness for some people, for others. And as the price climbs, it only gets faster in the edge – just like a potential buyer pond, which is inevitable.
