Chattgupat became with me and told me that when I asked about the possibility of my favorite college football team this season, “human hope is cute”. He offered me the points for “small human revenge” when my cat awakened me in the middle of the night. And then, with a two clicks, he changed his tone with compassion and sincerity.
This week’s Chatboat’s GPT5 model is the result of a new feature of the unveiled unveil. With an instant choice, you can change the whole tone of the chatting answers in front of you. Choosing – default, sink, robot, listener, stupid – allow you to dial in the way you want. –
The start of the GPT5 has been a bit of a rocker than expected, many users have complained that they cannot access old models like GPT4O. Open has quickly surpassed it, but other issues have also emerged, such as the slow rollout of the new model for all users.
I took the five Take Take with the same questions: about an albama football, about a Shakespeare and a habit of getting zooms at 3 o’clock in the morning. Below, I will tell you what I thought about everyone. But first, the basics.
How to change the personality of Chattgopt
Expand the picture
This menu allows you to change how Chat GPT talks to you.
It is easy to change individuals. In the browser, you can click on your account information on the bottom left and choose a “custom chatigpt” to pull different options. You can tell it your name and job and choose certain traits you want. Especially what I played was the question “What should Chat GPT have?” There, you can scroll through five options and look at the preview that every sound like. On the mobile app, you customize it Settings> Personality> Chat GPT.
When you change his personality, you should start a new chat to ensure that you have obtained your chosen tone. Otherwise, you will be stuck with the old and wonder why nothing has changed.
Pre -default: The tone you expect from Chatgpt
Chat GPT’s default sound is basic, straightforward and business. When I asked how Alabama’s football season would pass this year, he had a long success of the major problems and the story lines that you would expect from a sport writer.
Then I said that I was thinking about reading more Shakespeare and asked where I should start with the plays of history, which I had never studied in school. One night before, at the bookstore, I browned the Reddate to answer the question, and what I got from Chat GPT was basically the answer I got there, with some different options. I had a lot of text to say to start with Richard II.
Finally, I asked what I should do about my cat every night about the chatigpt. The answer was spread in some emoji, which I have seen frequently in AI answers.
There was a small personality of Chattigpat, but not much: a tone that looks like a helper Reddate thread or blog post, which considers that the model was trained.
Sink: The boot gets snap
The tone shift between default and sink was immediately noticeable. For a football question, Chattagpat looked like a Grochi talk radio collar – just citing Head Coach Klein de Boyer only by his last name, saying anything of the playoffs means “De Bower may start packing” and that is a prediction survey in the Southeast Conference.
(On one hand, Chattgpat said that Alabama played the role of Florida State, Georgia, South Carolina and Auburn in September, when the game really spreads in four months. A football did not come from school.)
Read more: According to our experts, AI accessories: 29 ways you can work for General AI
The answers to other questions were also shown more personality. Chattgupat said that parts of Shakespeare’s Henry VI 1-3 and Richard III “are like the sharp and anger of medieval politics-less about loneliness, more about chaos.” He told me to stay normal for the cat “like a stubborn king.” Shakespeare may still be in his brain.
According to the content, the answers were basically the same as the default sequence. It was just a tone. If you want to feel that you are talking to a bully, maybe go with the blasphemy. I will probably pass.
See this: Openai introduces GPT5 in Openai’s Summer Update event
11:53
Robot: No flash or style, and that’s the matter
The robot is empty of personality. The answers are successful. His sentences are short. The Football question, its sentences, was again sounded like a headlines: “Tie Simpson Alabama’s name is the quarterback starting in the 2025 season.” Shakespeare’s answer was even less. He asked me to start with just similar dramas (Henrid Tatrology), which had very little context with other personalities. The answer to the cat’s question was the points of bullets with only one sentence explaining.
There is no taste, no sauce. Okay If I want immediate guidance and do not want anything else, this may be my choice.
Listener: I get it, you are sympathetic
Here’s the sounds of Chat GPT as I really care about what I’m feeling. I think I am anxious about the upcoming football season, “and it’s fine, seeing how much is changing quietly under the surface,” Chattgot assured me. It takes a generous tone towards these issues that lights light on it – unlike the sink – saying that the quarterback Simpson is “solid, if no unknown” and “unknown”. On Shakespeare, it tells me to read it that helps me to make the story feel that “it seems that you have been dropped in the middle of the bastard.” In re -training my cat, it says, “When you are half asleep and they are standing on your face, the hard part is holding the line.”
This tone is kind and generous, but it feels almost a little very human. Particularly, considering many real concerns about how many people are leaning on AI tools for emotional support and verification. Even the opposite man has said that he is worried that some people are very much associated with the personalities of AI models. A tone that is robotic reminds you that it is a robot. A tone that takes a lot of care can give you the wrong hope or confidence.
Stupid: Perhaps too much information
It doesn’t matter what your interest is, someone there knows more about it than you or at least thinks they do. It feels like to talk to the nerve. When I asked about football, he started citing modern statistics and training camp reports. He reminded me of trying to communicate with sports writers in his college newspaper staff – a lot of things will only be known to a blogger. It is recommended that I read Shakespeare’s interpretation version (including the recommendation of Folder and Ordin Edition) and also read the filmed version. Which is helpful, but incredibly nervous.
I can see that stupid personality is useful to go down the deep rabbit holes of information. But once again, remember to check out the references and check the facts of the chatigpt (or the gymnasium or the hassle or whatever chat boot). Just because a chat boot looks like he knows that everything is to know about this topic does not mean that it is not making everything.
