Under a new law informed by Japan, Apple will have to allow third -party browsers to work on the iOS without relying on their web cut engine. The new mandate, which comes in December, is an attempt by the country to thwart the alleged anti -Tech Dev’s alleged competitive methods. Like the European Union, browser alternative browser engines, such as Firefox, Microsoft Age, and Opera, will be able to offer access to access to Bulk and Gaco.
Apple already allows multiple non -webcott browsers on iOS in the EU
According to Japan’s Mobile Software Competition Act leader letters (MSCA), developed by the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), Apple restrictions that allow only browsers to use web cut engine are competitive. According to the regulator, it makes it impossible for other browser engines such as Google Chrome, Opera, Microsoft Age, and Firefox to implement their browser engines.
Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, and other browsers available on iOS are currently forced to use web cut engines. On other platforms such as Android, browsers use bulk engine, such as Chrome, Edge, and Opera, while Firefox Gaco uses.
However, this is not the first time Apple has been forced to present a browser selection. In 2024, Capetino Tech Dev released the iOS 17.4 update, with the company allowing third -party browser engines to fly to the European Union thanks to its Digital Markets Act. However, Apple has imposed harsh sanctions on the region, which stopped the development of Gaco and other browser engines on the iOS.
The same update introduced support for downloading alternative app stores and installing apps from outside the App Store in Europe. Android has offered the qualifications for many years, which they can download and install the AP.
Apple users in the European Union also received new default app controls as part of the iOS 17.4 update. Tech Dev has also been confused in several anti -competitive cases in the United States, which is the most recent case filed against him by Fortatite’s developer epic sports. The US -based Tech Dev only allowed the app to pay, on which he received a heavy commission. The exercise was declared unfair by the US District Court, which instructed the company to allow app developers to accept payment from other sources.
