Short form video is available everywhere in 2025. From Teltok to Instagram, YouTube to Snap Chat, you have no shortage of options when you want to scratch this particular itching. But the landscape was not always widespread, and the short -shaped content was not released by this evolution.
While Snap Chat was the first to rolling here, it was not too late after the wine. And before Wine also had the opportunity to release his mobile apps, he acquired herself through Twitter. Twitter’s initial interest really helped to advance the platform’s success, and its six seconds clips have encouraged creativity from a new generation of creators, in which many famous names are now successful for the first time.
A few years later, though, everyone was primarily working on the wine, many social platforms introduced local support for short form video. And as soon as Twitter began to eliminate the bull, stopped new uploads before closing the service, Techtok mainly emerged to steal the crown of the wine.
It has been basically the world in which we have been living for the past eight years, Valley has been linked to our memories of short-form-video old memories. But 2025 is a dirty, weird year, and whatever the iota of power is, they only go away from the worst thoughts they are able to think about.
So Sure It also includes Elon Musk.
Yesterday, on the nutrition, Kasturi, with his desire, published the intention to bring back the bull in AI form.
The sentence alone should be enough to send a small cold to your spine. Bringing back things that already lead their way can be a lot of suggestions themselves, but when this effort is immediately. It is only trying to move this old memories into something new … so it is practically throwing a red flag in our throat. Pogo did not save the ALF, and Ai would not save the bull.
The biggest question here is how to look “bull but Ai” even. At a higher level, it is not difficult to think that Musk and his fellow AI supporters can make a picture of a tool of the offer when there are no other limited factors in the game: a system that takes the user’s input (or yet he knows what they want based on past analytics) and in response to the short format in response.
A particular mind that, maybe it seems perfect – no matter what creators, no tendency to pursue, only users say what they want and serve their service. Of course, while it is not currently So One idea is that we do not even need to talk about it, it is not close to anything economically viable.
Pogo did not save the ALF, and Ai would not save the bull.
Tools like Google’s VEO 3 can feel it as AI -powered video spag was waiting for us to open, but now such solutions are very slow and hungry as we will need a public video app practically on any scale.
Ok, so what else can happen? Well, the next best (worst?) Version will probably be a hybrid between it we have just described and the past bulls, just using AI to produce boot loaded videos in all kinds of popular articles, and then serve them later to consumers. It has at least the benefit of the voice of the remote.
Why is a basket straight above the middle of the court? Likewise, like this V3 clip, don’t expect anything you see in the Iwan world.
Will the creators be included exactly? So far we are talking about the systems where Musk’s AI will be primarily responsible for serving all material, but it is not necessary to make such a project. The “wine in form” may be the same as OG wine, but now is clearly embracing creators who are very inclined to AI, as we have started to do YouTube.
On the sliding scale of our possibility, this is probably still the most practical, but also slightly inferior – less “AI form” and more “like every other video platform in 2025.” Which will surprise us to know what to do.
It may be the most disappointing part of this debate. We are dividing the hair exactly the way we look like an epideide bull, but the problem we are feeling is especially about the grapes and the AI content is more about the widespread appeal.
Perhaps it is just that the bull was from an era where the creators used to hurry up to make a name for themselves in the at that time. These efforts have not always worked. Just as there was very little effort, the content there was reduced. But others were discovering what was really played, building the audience’s audience and bringing us back to the bull repeatedly.
These creators have taken everything forward, and if the wine is about to appear again today, the only way to avoid a large -scale content space must be tapped in AI tools to create a new video library.
The wise audience is unlikely to find a bull that is especially charming. But if Musk’s devastating influence on Twitter has taught us anything, these are also services that are deeply undesirable to consumers with taste when they do not need to come into the wider depths of the Internet.
There are absolutely army of people who will like nothing but their days, watching a second video of one second after another. And i hope they Never Get whatever they want.
