Since Meta Platforms are filled with more AI inflicing content, the company still has a lot of work to do when it comes to implementing its policies around the manipulative media. The overweight board is once again criticizing the social media company for dealing with such positions, and its latest decision states that its failure to permanently enforce its rules is “contradictory and blasphemous.”
If it seems familiar, the reason is that this is the second time since last year when the overweight board has used the word “non -controversial” to describe Meta’s approach to manipulation media. Earlier, the board urged Meta to update its rules after Biden’s misleading modified video went viral on Facebook. In response, Meta said she would increase the use of its labels to identify AI-infilled content and to labter more significant in “high risk” conditions. This label, like the one below, note when a post was prepared or edited using AI.
A piece of AI-integrated material is a “high risk” when an example of a label determines the meta. (Screenshot (Meta))
The board said that although this approach is still decreasing. He said in his latest decision, “The board is concerned that, despite the increasing spread of manipulation content in the formats, the implementation of Meta’s manipulation media policy is contradictory.” “Meta’s failure to automatically label all the events of the same manipulation media is contradictory and blasphemous.”
The statement comes in a post -post -based decision claiming to present audio of two politicians in Iraqi Kurdistan. The “recorded conversation” is understood includes talks about the region’s upcoming elections and other “blasphemous plans”. The board said the post was reported to Meta for false information, but the company “closed the case without a human review.” Meta later labeled some examples of audio clip but is not actually reported.
According to the board, the matter is not an outlet. Meta apparently told the board that it could not automatically identify and apply labels on audio and video posts, only on “static images”. This means that many examples of the same audio or video clip cannot be cured, which can lead to further confusion. The overweight board also criticized Meta for relying on third parties to identify AI-Misipulated video and audio, as it did in this matter.
The board wrote, “Seeing that Meta is one of the world’s leading technology and AI companies, with the extensive use of its resources and meta platforms, the board has reaffirmed that the MATA should invest in technology to identify and label the manipulation video and audio on the scale.” “The board is unclear whether a company of technical skills and resources that identifies the media with potentially manipulative media in high -risk conditions for media outlets or reliable partners.”
In its recommendations to the Meta, the board said that the company should adopt a “clear process” to label the “equal or similar material” in situations when it includes a “high risk” label in a post. The board also recommended that the label be shown in a language that matches the rest of their settings on Facebook, Instagram and threads.
Meta did not respond to a comment. The company has 60 days to respond to the board’s recommendations.
