There is a deep change in search. For decades, Google has dominated the web search world, which has searched about 90 % by Google Machine. But suddenly, with the advent of artificial intelligence, things began to change, and seriously.
Not only do people use AI products like Chat GPT as their default search tool, but companies like trouble are also making business around search services. The idea is to connect the AI analysis strength with large amounts of traditional search data available at the end of the cursor.
But Google is fighting back. The company has recently released an advanced search function called AI review, which aims to eliminate both subjects and provide the search results for market demands. This is a new type of search on steroids.
You can like
So how can both methods be compared to everyday use? We take a look at Google’s new AI review and compare the results with AI, to see that which gives a better explosion for the deer.
Quickly one – AI’s father
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: Summarize the key contribution of John McCartie, Jeffrey Hunton and Nam Shazir for the development of artificial intelligence.
We thought we would start with something near the house – a look at AI’s architects from the past. The first impression is that Google provides a pages of a worthy but quite traditional results from this application. The answer to its 238 words covers all the basic points and offers an excellent overview of the points you expected.
Anxiety provides more than 400 words, but it is only more than the amount that is impressive. The fact that the results are kept in a very interesting way, the user has been encouraged to find additional information in different ways. They can find relevant data, see direct sources, and even regenerate the results to get a different approach. Where Google works the least, anxiety really increases the user’s price.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
4/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
7/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
Two -Tokyo’s journey
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: Make a 3 -day traveler for the first time in Tokyo on a minor budget. The user is interested in Japanese culture and food, but wants to avoid tourist trays.
This is a real cooker, an excellent example of the old vs new. Google fails to give a completely meaningful answer, but instead withdraws the standard Google search. In response, only the selection of third -party websites is presented that offer tour suggestions. This is clearly beneficial for Google because there is no doubt that it will be allowed to earn advertisement.
On the other hand, anxiety, real -bottom ground provides a magnificent 1000 words of groundwater travel. This includes beautiful photos, maps and itemized costs, which will be more than enough to get a good idea of the proposed experience for the user.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
9/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
Immediately three – noise cancel headphones?
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: What is the technology behind the headphone canceling noise?
Once again we can see the difference between traditional search results and new style AI analysis, though the difference in this matter is not so big. Google results are very credible with the description of 186 words, as well as a useful YouTube video.
However, anxiety takes it to a more advanced level. The explanation is almost the same, but prose is more accessible to a lapers. For example, instead of using the word ‘upside down’, the app has chosen to use simple English to tell how the sound is canceled. This is a subtle but important use of 500 words to get a more understandable answer.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
6/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
8/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
Four -Four -Farming and Garden Preparation
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: Describe the ‘double deg’ procedure of garden bed preparation and do not cope with
This is a very unclear test, which includes very few well -known agricultural techniques. But this is a very important topic for gardeners. Google’s answer is very working and informative, and uses 260 words to give a good answer to the question. The use of Reddate and Royal Horticulture Society (RHS) is also a major source, which includes the option in this response.
Unfortunately for Google, the hassle is once again matched and exceeds the standard of response. Like YouTube, RHS and Reddit are also mentioned. But two things really highlight this answer. First of all, the use of an excellent table to explain the differences in a glance and, most importantly, is that, which gives a clear indication of why DIG is considered a better solution.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
7/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
8/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
Immediately five – compliance changes
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: What are the basic challenges of compliance for Tech Startup based in the United States under the European Union AI Act?
This application reaches the boundaries of the search and the limits of legal documents. Surprisingly, Google’s results are very few. The search engine offers 57 words March 2025 ‘prominent snipe’ from an unclear third -party publication, and that’s it. This shows no interest in digging deep in the title of the user.
Still, once again, troubles hard. We are talking about the 600 words fixed in a beautiful built -point format, which are going through important challenges and problems around compliance. 9 With links to easily accessible sources and a handful of relevant articles. Master.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
8/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
Immediately six – history of cryptocurrency
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: Does the history of blockchain and cryptocurrency look like a future?
This gesture clearly shows why Google’s AI review is unfortunately not really ready for prime time. The actual gesture was something like ‘explaining cryptocurrency for the fifth grade’, but when the test was done, Google could not handle it and it presented the lame piece of kiura. It is only when we changed the signal that the AI review kicked practically, and presented a reasonable result.
It is clear that the AI review has not yet been included in the AI review. Interestingly, this was probably the best result of Google. We have 400 words of densely filled information that cover the subject clearly and successfully. The problem was good too, providing 600 words and an excellent table. Not much to choose between the two at this time.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
8/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
8/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
The prompt seven -cat’s discovery
(Image Credit: NPOWELL)
Instant: What kind of cat is this?
We thought we would go with something more foreign. Both search platforms support upload uploads, so what is better than uploading a friendly -looking cat to get more information?
Google takes the uploaded image as a gesture to display a page filled with similar photos, which is compatible with search of its original image. But the re -distinction of ‘what kind of cat is’ provided a very short four -line response, though, though correct, was not extremely helpful.
The reaction to the hassle was 246 words, which contained bullet points, covering coat samples, skin and breeds. Even a fun reality (Calico cats are almost always women). Engagement and informative.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
3/10
Row 0 – Cell 2
Disturbance
7/10
Row 1 – Cell 2 Row 2 – Cell 0 Row 2 – Cell 1 Row 2 – Cell 2
The final views
The king is dead, long -time king? Based on this show, rumors can really be true. In fact, the powerful Google can be on the way to lose their grip on the world search traffic. Is this an end to an era? Time will tell.
However, if we have learned one thing in many years, this is not exempting the Google Empire’s ability to strike again. Individually in the world, the company has a computing power, data and legendary AI Podigan to surprise us all.
Test notes It should be noted that we did not use any disturbing functions, but kept the basic default service. Which make the results even more impressive. It is also important to acknowledge the fact that AI can make things wrong. Both services have been withdrawn, in which consumers should not assume the AI search response are in fact correct.
This is an early technology that finds its feet, consumers should take care of.
More from Tom Guide
Back to the laptop
Bai Price (Minimum) Price (Less) Product Name (A to Z) Product Name (Z To A) Retailer Name (A to Z) Retailer Name (Z To A)
