Last year, I wrote about how one of my articles, which appeared in the upper part of the first search results, was swallowed up and collided with this page by AI review. Google finally adjusted how it cited sources and significantly added individual paragraphs.
Although publishers are primarily concerned about a wave of AI search tools that remove visitors who otherwise go straight to online information sources, some marketers are looking for visitors who end their promotional sites. “We are definitely watching the traffic you receive,” says Jim Yu, the founder and CEO of the SEO platform for marketers, said. “As long as they have made three more interactions with AI and then clicked on my website, they are very good. Therefore, time and conversion rates on the site, such as engagement matrix, are eliminated.”
For an executive of SEO strategies in Lily Ray, Marketing Agency, Emsoo, seemingly high quality low visitors are still insufficient – and it offers an existential threat. “Publishers, content creators, and people who make money through display advertising and traffic make money in the future?” She asks One possible answer is a partnership. The wired publisher has a business contract with Kund Nest’s Openi so that Articles are available in Chat GPT search answers. The company does not have a comparison contract with Google.
Despite rays concerns, its initial impression about AI mode is relatively positive. “In my experience so far, I find this better product than this AI review.” She says. From a ray point of view, the beta version of the AI format was more successful than the AI review in understanding the questions and providing accurate answers. Based on my initial feedback, follow -up questions about similar topics feel like it feels like improvement. However, I encountered mistakes while examining.
I asked the Beta version of the AI format “What Giants Win”, to see how it would answer the question of potentially ordinary and regional sports. “Yes, San Francisco lost their recent game from Giants Colorado Rockies.” In addition, the AI format cited social media posts from X, as it repeatedly presented racist and misinformation about the national IQ in Africa.
“Sierra Leone’s average IQ score is much lower than Sierra Leone’s global average,” read a result of testing. “Sierra Leone’s average wit is stated as 45.07.” This is a very special number, and it has revealed from Debonic research that white supremacy has released and spread online. Last year, after a wired investigation, and similar numbers were shown and similar numbers were shown in response to several AI search engines in AI, Google closed AI review answers for national IQ search questions. At the time of the test, he has not yet taken the same precautions in the beta version AI format.
I asked Google to comment on my concerns about the accuracy of its productive AI search experiences, and received the answer. “The accuracy rate for AI’s review is equal to other well -established search features, such as significant pieces, Google spokesman Craig Ever says.” “We continue to gain more benefits in the fields such as the facts, and it is well known how we reach AI mode.”
Since Google has long dominated the search engine market, the company has also adapted the Internet structure to change its algorithm. Even if they are disappointed with the changes, many publishers feel that they have no other option other than play if they want their website to show the top in Google’s search results. Google Click Throw can eat more in the rate as it is too much to bow down to the AI-infield search results. Rapid transition can have more effect on online publishers, many of which are already in financial positions and rely on Google Search as the basic driver of their traffic.
“This is the future of Google Search,” says Schwartz. So, we have to adopt as a publishers and searches. “I think the change is embraced.”
